Kodachrome - The Lightroom Presets

You can’t make a digital replication of Kodachrome slide film*.

I’m putting that sentence right up front in the hope of deterring any photography-forum-dwelling purists from sticking pins into effigies of my DSLR cameras.

The only way you can truly create a Kodachrome image is by shooting Kodachrome film.  There, I’ve said it and hope that's clear.

Sadly, Kodachrome is no more and even if you were to find a dozen rolls inside a dusty trunk in your grandfather’s loft, you won’t find a processing lab with the technology to process it. Kodachrome is not merely pining for the fjords, it has ceased to be.

For the benefit of my millennial readers, Kodachrome was a slide or transparency film introduced by Kodak before the Second World War and discontinued in 2009. The film was enormously popular with amateur and professional photographers alike and many of the iconic images associated with magazines like National Geographic were shot on Kodachrome. Steve McCurry’s ‘Afghan Girl’ portrait was shot on Kodachrome, for example (and later digitised but we’re not opening that can of worms right now).

Iconic Kodachrome

It’s fair to say that Kodachrome was the unseen superstar behind many iconic images for nearly 75 years before digital technology came along and pushed it into the wilderness. Sales dried up and Kodachrome eventually withered and died. Such was Kodachrome’s iconic status that when Kodak presented the very last roll of Kodachrome to Steve McCurry, National Geographic made a documentary about it. Imagine the pressure of having to create something really memorable with the last 36 frames of Kodachrome ever to exist.

“Err, sorry, I think I overexposed this roll. Can I have another?”

“Nope!”

As a reminder about what shooting with Kodachrome was like, this 30-minute documentary is well worth watching.

Kodachrome might have been consigned to history but you can still find plenty of enthusiasts willing to talk in glowing terms about its properties. (which reminds me to ask whether you agree that telling stories in old age should be called “anecdotage”?).

If you want to impress in one of the Interweb's Kodachrome forums, chip in with phrases such as “I loved how Kodachrome’s lack of dye couplers in the emulsion resulted in reduced light scattering” and “I found that push-processing resulted in a magenta-red colour shift”. You’ll be golden.

'Afghan Girl' by Steve McCurry

'Afghan Girl' by Steve McCurry

Kodachrome Characteristics

Such adoration isn’t unwarranted. Kodachrome really did set the Gold Standard. As Kodak’s own Technical Data Sheet explains, Kodachrome’s characteristics included:

  • Exceptional results in outdoor, travel, nature, advertising, medical and museum/art applications.
  • Extremely sharp
  • Extremely fine grain
  • Reproduces subtle colour naturally
  • Archival (Kodachrome films are the most archival transparency films)

I’m told that yellow is the least stable colour in a Kodachrome slide but even yellow tones will only show some noticeable fading after 185 years. I wonder how many computer hard drives will last that long.

Kodachrome's subtle tones, biting contrast and dynamic range have been a significant stylistic contributor to our visual heritage so perhaps it’s understandable that we might be tempted to try and capture some of the magic of Kodachrome in our digital work.

I’ll leave you to discuss the pros and cons of that. If you ask ten photographers their views on pretty much anything, you’re likely to hear twenty different opinions so we won’t be embarking upon a discussion about the merits of this, that, who, why or whatever.

As another example of the iconic status Kodachrome reached, you might like to read the rest of this blog post whilst listening to Paul Simon's song, Kodachrome, in the background.

Kodachrome
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world’s a sunny day
I got a Nikon camera
I love to take a photograph
So mama don’t take my Kodachrome away
— Paul Simon, 'Kodachrome'

My own opinion is that I miss shooting Kodachrome. There are worse things, of course, and I don’t lose sleep over it but if Kodachrome came back, I’d use it. One of the most exciting moments for many film photographers, other than actually taking photographs, was when a box of slides arrived back from the processing lab and we’d hold them up to a window, one by one, examining them through a magnifying loupe. The tangible delight of holding a physical slide up to the light and peering into the frame to see the vibrant colours of the scene we’d captured seemed nothing short of magical. We were Light Wizards, capturing moments and shrinking them into our enchanted slide frames for eternity. Well, for 185 years, anyway.

Panoramic landscapes, sunrises and sunsets, family portraits, street scenes… we’d hand write captions in tiny lettering on small labels and stick them to the slide mounts. Some of us were fortunate enough to be able to forward slides to our editors and stock libraries. Most of us would compile slides into extensive “Our Recent Holiday” slideshows to be projected onto one of those precariously balanced screens. Our audience of long-suffering friends would try their best to stay awake but the darkened room and rhythmic hum of a slide carousel often combined to create a somnolent effect.

A history of Kodachrome Slide Mounts

A history of Kodachrome Slide Mounts

Kodachrome Challenges

However, back to the present. Given that we can manipulate our digital files in an almost infinite number of ways, surely there’s a way that we can recreate something of the essence of Kodachrome? It turns out that’s much easier said than done.

Firstly, Kodachrome slides were designed for projection. Most projectors gave a yellow tint from their tungsten bulbs. To counter this, Kodachrome had a slight but noticeable blue cast. Similarly, shadows tended to be intense to compensate for the human eyes’ perceptions of a projected image. If you wanted to build a digital emulation of Kodachrome (I think you can see where I’m going with this), should you build one based upon the contrasty, blue-cast slides or the more natural projected image? There are scanned versions of Kodachrome available but the variety of scanners and scanning processes introduce a tremendously unpredictable number of variations. Shadow density was really hard to unpack in a scan and scanners that hadn’t been accurately profiled would yield… well, you might as well have asked your kids to draw their interpretation of the scene onto their bedroom wall with crayons.

So how to proceed when there are so many variables and potential inconsistencies? I must admit that I’d pretty much given up any hope of building a reasonable Kodachrome emulation and put the idea on the back burner. However, some projects have a habit of niggling away until they’re given full attention. I like to think that’s an indication that they have some inherent value. I’ll let you be the judge of whether that’s proved to be the case.

It’s taken several weeks but I’ve finally arrived at what I think is a reasonable attempt at recreating some of the properties of Kodachrome. “How did you do that, Mr. Gough?”, I hear you enquire with customary politeness.

Well, dear reader, I shall offer you a very brief summary of the process.

Front page of a Kodachrome Technical Data Sheet, included with all boxed film

Front page of a Kodachrome Technical Data Sheet, included with all boxed film

There are plenty of film simulation presets available online. Some are better than others. Many offer a pretty simple range of colour and tone adjustment shortcuts, which is fine. They’re a broad brush and if you’re looking for a one-click way of creating an old polaroid look or something then that’s OK. I’d describe it as the Instagram approach. One click. Faux film effect employed. Done. I was looking for something a little more specific.

I knew that I had some old Kodachrome film scans, which had been copied in a lab with a scanner profiled with an IT8 target. If you don’t know what that is, don’t worry, just be impressed that I do. Or, at least, that I claim to.

Assuming those scans were pretty accurate renderings of Kodachrome 25 and Kodachrome 64 slides (I don’t have any Kodachrome 200 scans, unfortunately), I did a kind of reverse engineering project on them. Using Adobe’s DNG Profile Editor, I was able to import the scans, employ a calibrated colour correction, then invert the values, which would, in theory, provide a way of turning the hues and tones of a standard digital file into the hues and tones found in a Kodachrome image. Voila!

Presets are camera specific

One of the problems with most of the Lightroom presets you’ll find online is that they’re not camera specific. You can throw a bunch of colour and tone adjustments at an image and it’ll change accordingly but it's difficult to work with any degree of consistency, especially if you're using more than one camera. The only way to create a profile that’s reasonably consistent is by building a unique profile for each specific camera model. And that, my friends, is not the work of a moment, let me assure you.

Once the initial recipes were created, I applied them to individual camera profiles, one by one. You know how there are profiles like “Landscape”, “Portrait” and “Vivid” in your camera settings and also in Lightroom's Develop module? Well, those profiles are shortcuts to different ways of translating colours and tones from the raw data. I based all of my Kodachrome profiles on each camera’s “Faithful” or “Neutral” profiles (different manufacturers call them by different names).

Would you be surprised to learn that “Faithful” and “Neutral” profiles give the most faithful and neutral results? Perhaps that’s where they get their names? Who can say?

Kodachrome 25 and Kodachrome 64 Presets for Lightroom

At the time of writing, I’ve built a dozen Kodachrome profiles for cameras including the Canon 5D III, Leica M, Sony a7RII, Nikon D5 and Fujifilm X-Pro 1. The presets will work with Lightroom 4, 5, 6 and CC.

“Kodachrome “Kodachrome

KODACHROME 25 PROFILE

Girl in the Temple Kitchen, Tamshing Goemba, Jakar, Bhutan
Canon EOS 5D II + EF 16-35 f/2.8 L USM. 1/30 @ f/2.8 ISO800

“Kodachrome “Kodachrome

KODACHROME 64 Profile + 1.66EV

Shibrampur, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Canon EOS 5D III + EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM. 1/200 @ f/2.8 ISO100

Though I say so myself, I quite like these profiles. I should point out that the profiles are not designed to alter a digital photograph in a sensational or radical way. They don’t give a Victorian sepia cast or apply some crazy cross-processing filter. That’s not what Kodachrome was about.

Kodachrome produced sharp images with reasonably accurate colour fidelity and, for the time, a pretty impressive dynamic range. But it also had other noticeable characteristics. It was pretty contrasty and had some slight colour balance shifts.

Kodachrome’s dynamic range reached about eight stops. The human eye sees a range of about 15 stops. That means that we can perceive much greater detail in shadows and highlights then the film could capture. Whilst digital camera manufacturers race to give us as much dynamic range as possible (the best digital camera currently available has a range of about 9.9 stops), I’m not convinced that I really want all that dynamic range. One of the attractions of photography for me is in knowing the limitations of the equipment and using it intentionally. When I photograph a Buddhist monk reading prayers in a darkened room, I don't want dynamic range, I'm looking for the contrast to contribute to the atmosphere. That’s hopefully what will help the image resonate.

Knowing that Kodachrome - or any other film - had a limited dynamic range prompted us to learn how to expose for the shadows or highlights, according to how we wanted to render the scene. That kind of intentional control is - or at least it used to be - a significant part of the creative process.

The Kodachrome profiles I’ve built won’t provide a one-click means of creating a groovy, faded Holga effect and they’re unlikely to appear in the Top Ten List of Hipster Photo Filters. They do, however, recreate something of Kodachrome’s contrast with denser shadows and blacks that never quite reach 100% black. They impart fine grain, virtually invisible in Kodachrome 25 and only apparent in the Kodachrome 64 version if you really squint into the shadows. The subtle colour shifts are based upon projected versions of Kodachrome so you won’t be seeing funky pink skies or curious colour shift malarkey. The profiles won’t suit every image but then Kodachrome didn’t suit every scene.

Download Kodachrome Profiles

Creating the profiles has been a labour of love but now I think they’re mature enough to make their way out into the world. If you’d like to try the presets for yourself, first check that your camera make and model is supported (the list is below), then do the clicky thing on the button below to go to the store.

“GAVIN “GAVIN

KODACHROME 25 Profile + 0.66 EV + WHITE BALANCE

'Graszi' playing a tanpura, Pushkar, India
Canon EOS 5D III + EF 85mm f/1.2 II USM. 1/2,000 @ f/1.2 ISO50

“GAVIN “GAVIN

KODACHROME 25 Profile + 0.66 EV + WHITE BALANCE + Straightening

Waiting for the train's departure, Colombo Fort Railway Station, Sri Lanka
Leica M + 28mm f/1.2. 1/125 @ f/4 ISO800


Pay what you like

In the spirit of sharing, I haven’t attached a set price to the presets. Instead, I’m happy for you to pay what you like and what you can afford. If you’re a struggling photography student, for example, you’re very welcome to pick up the presets for a few dollars. I’ll appreciate whatever amount you believe is fair. Lightroom presets generally cost between $15 and $100 so that’s the ballpark.


Finally, here's a recent story from the New York Times about a bag of Kodachrome slides that were mysteriously abandoned in the street. No doubt Kodachrome will continue to be a part of intriguing stories.

Cameras currently supported (Updated 24th July, 2016)

(Kodachrome presets will not work accurately with models not listed)

  • Canon EOS 5D
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark II
  • Canon EOS 5D Mark III
  • Canon EOS 5Ds
  • Canon EOS 6D
  • Canon EOS 7D
  • Canon EOS 7D Mark II
  • Canon EOS 10D
  • Canon EOS 20D
  • Canon EOS 40D
  • Canon EOS 60D
  • Canon EOS 80D
  • Canon EOS 100D
  • Canon EOS 400D
  • Canon EOS 700D
  • Canon EOS 750D
  • Canon EOS 760D
  • Canon EOS 1200D
  • Canon EOS 1300D
  • Canon EOS 1D Mark III
  • Canon EOS 1D Mark IV
  • Canon EOS-1D X
  • Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
  • Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II
  • Canon Powershot G5
  • Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
  • Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro
  • Fujifilm FinePix X100
  • Fujifilm X-Pro1
  • Fujifilm X-Pro2
  • Fujifilm X-T1
  • Fujifilm X-T2
  • Fujifilm X-T10
  • Fujifilm X70
  • Fujifilm X100S
  • Fujifilm X100T
  • Rico GR II
  • Leica M (Typ 240)
  • Leica M8
  • Leica M9
  • Leica Q (Typ 116)
  • Nikon D3S
  • Nikon D4
  • Nikon D4S
  • Nikon D5
  • Nikon D90
  • Nikon D610
  • Nikon D700
  • Nikon D750
  • Nikon D800
  • Nikon D800E
  • Nikon D810
  • Nikon D5300
  • Nikon D7000
  • Nikon D7100
  • Nikon D7200
  • Olympus OM-D E-M1
  • Olympus OM-D E-M5
  • Olympus OM-D E-M5 II
  • Olympus OM-D E-M10
  • Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
  • Panasonic DMC-GH2
  • Panasonic DMC-GX7
  • Pentax K-1
  • Pentax K-3
  • Pentax K-3 II
  • Sony DSC-RX1RM2
  • Sony DSC-RX10M3
  • Sony DSC-RX100M4
  • Sony a7
  • Sony a7 II
  • Sony a7R
  • Sony a7R II
  • Sony a7S
  • Sony a7S II
  • Sony a6000
  • Sony a6300
  • Sony NEX-7

Request support for your camera

Name *
Name

If you would like to request support for a specific camera, please let me know by completing the form and I'll drop a note in your Inbox when an update is available.

 

 

 

“GAVIN “GAVIN

KODACHROME 25 Profile + 0.66 EV + WHITE BALANCE

The Station Master's Office, Kandy to Badulla Railway, Sri Lanka
Sony a7RII + 35mm f/2.8. 1/60 @ f/2.8 ISO500

(*Probably.)

Resources and Further Reading